International child abduction: What you need to know
The legal framework governing international child abduction in England and Wales is shaped by the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. This convention establishes how cases of international child abduction are handled, with over 100 countries as contracting parties. However, the convention's enforcement varies across jurisdictions.
What Constitutes International Child Abduction?
A child is considered to be internationally abducted if:
They are wrongfully removed from their country of habitual residence.
They are wrongfully retained in a country that is not their habitual residence.
Wrongful removal or retention occurs when this is done without the consent of a parent who is exercising custody rights at the time, or contrary to the terms of a court order.
The core principle of the 1980 Hague Convention is that a child wrongfully removed or retained should be returned promptly to their habitual residence, allowing courts in that jurisdiction to determine decisions about their care and future.
Case law defines a child’s habitual residence as the place where they are integrated into a social and family environment, based on factors such as language, schooling, medical registrations, and family ties.
What Happens if a Child is Internationally Abducted?
If a child is removed or retained in a country that is a signatory to the 1980 Hague Convention without the consent of a parent, the left-behind parent can file an application under the Convention. In England and Wales, this is done through the Family Court, who are the designated Central Authority for such cases.
The Family Court can forward the application to the Central Authority in the country where the child is present, initiating legal proceedings for the child’s return.
If a child is brought to England and Wales in potential violation of the Convention, proceedings can be initiated in the High Court (Family Division). The abducting parent can present defences, such as:
Consent: The left-behind parent had agreed to the removal or retention.
Child’s objections: The child is mature enough to object to the return and expresses a strong preference to stay.
Risk of harm: Returning the child would expose them to physical or psychological harm.
Settlement: The child has become settled in their new environment.